Pittsburgh Pirates 3, Chicago Cubs 4
Final score, pitching lines and standings context.
| Pitcher | Team | Role | IP | H | ER | BB | K | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Skenes | PIT | Starter | 7.0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 82 |
| Gregory Soto | PIT | ReliefLoss | 1.0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 31 |
| Clay Holmes | CHC | Starter | 5.2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 100 |
| Ryan Rolison | CHC | ReliefWin | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| Ryan Zeferjahn | CHC | ReliefSave | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1 |
Matchup at a glance
PitcherStat calculationPregame contextStarting pitchers
Cubs’ stronger season profile meets Pirates’ recent surge in Wrigley matchup
Saturday’s matchup at Wrigley Field sets up as a useful contrast between the bigger season body of work and the shorter recent snapshot.
The Cubs bring the better record at 82-66, compared with Pittsburgh’s 74-74, and they’ve been the more productive offensive club over the full season. Chicago is averaging 5.35 runs per game to Pittsburgh’s 4.80, with edges in on-base percentage (.340 to .330), slugging (.431 to .402) and OPS (.771 to .732). Those differences help explain why the Cubs sit second in the NL Central, while the Pirates are third.
But the Pirates arrive in better recent form. Pittsburgh is 7-3 over its last 10 games, while Chicago is 4-6, even though the Cubs have still scored 5.00 runs per game in that span. The Pirates’ recent run production has been lower at 4.20 per game, so their push lately has not simply been about outslugging teams.
That makes the probable starting-pitcher matchup especially interesting, because it points in two directions at once.
For Chicago, Clay Holmes has been excellent at run prevention. His 2.83 ERA and 0.52 home runs allowed per nine innings are both better than Paul Skenes’ marks, and Holmes also owns a slightly lower WHIP at 1.12. If the game turns into a question of limiting damage, Holmes’ profile gives the Cubs a strong case.
Skenes, though, carries the more overpowering and durable statistical profile. In 29 starts and 155 innings, he has a lower FIP than Holmes (3.08 to 3.46), a much higher strikeout rate (10.5 per nine to 6.8), a lower walk rate (2.6 to 3.1), and a significantly better quality-start percentage, 51% to 33%. Holmes has worked only 86 innings across 15 starts, so Skenes has been asked to carry a larger load while still missing more bats and posting strong underlying numbers.
There is not much separation in the bullpens. Pittsburgh holds a narrow edge in ERA (4.22 to 4.28), WHIP (1.29 to 1.31) and strikeouts per nine (9.1 to 8.1), but none of those gaps is dramatic.
So the game shapes up around a simple tension: Chicago has been the better team over the long season and has the more complete offense, while Pittsburgh brings the hotter recent record and a starter whose strikeout-heavy profile can narrow that season-wide gap quickly.
- Chicago owns the stronger season resume: 82-66 record, 5.35 runs per game, and clear edges in OBP, SLG and OPS.
- Pittsburgh has been better lately, going 7-3 in its last 10 games while the Cubs are 4-6.
- The probable starters offer a split profile: Clay Holmes has the lower ERA and HR/9, while Paul Skenes leads in FIP, K/9, BB/9 and quality-start rate.
How the lineups match the starters' pitch mix
Pitch data coverage: partial. Usage and velocity only.