San Francisco Giants 10, St. Louis Cardinals 3
Final score, pitching lines and standings context.
| Pitcher | Team | Role | IP | H | ER | BB | K | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blade Tidwell | SF | StarterWin | 6.2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 95 |
| Andre Pallante | STL | StarterLoss | 5.0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 99 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 12 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
Matchup at a glance
PitcherStat calculationPregame contextStarting pitchers
Pallante Meets a Giants Team Searching for a Road Reset
San Francisco comes to St. Louis on a four-game skid and with a 26–50 road record, numbers that make a turnaround difficult to assume. Andre Pallante offers the Cardinals a steady opening plan at 3.45 ERA, 3.64 FIP and 1.23 WHIP. Blade Tidwell has worked only 46.2 innings and sits at 4.82 ERA. The Giants have still taken three of four in the season series, so this matchup has not followed the broader standings. San Francisco’s bigger problem is sustaining offense away from home; Pallante is well positioned to make that challenge harder.
How the lineups match the starters' pitch mix
Pitch data coverage: partial. Usage and velocity only.
Team OPS vs opposing starter's hand
Lineup strength vs today's starter
Weighted by batting-order spot. Season rates are regressed toward league average before they enter the model.
Slight edge: STL